Análisis y valoración de la prueba en el proceso penal

Abstract

We can clearly observe that the Justice Institution does not enjoy credibility in our society. This generates a great social and cultural impact and entails, in many cases, the exercise of justice by one's own hand. Thus, a social disorder is unleashed that is adverse to democracy in its entire structure and this has to do with the professionalism of both the procedural subjects and the auxiliaries who contribute their work. It was chosen to carry out this study at the national level, contemplating the Upper Valley and Middle Valley area, and contributing international doctrine. The author set out to analyze the situation through a general objective: the analysis and assessment of the evidence in the criminal process, the role of the judicial authorities, the decisions that directly impact individuals and society in general, and the experts involved in the criminal process (years 2011 - Accusatory System) to the present; and three specific objectives: subjectivities / arbitrariness that promote mistrust and lack of credibility of the justice institution, system of guarantees, expertise and role of criminology. To address these objectives, a bibliographic research, visits to the Judiciary (non-participant observation) and in-depth interviews will be carried out.