Skip navigation
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://rid.unrn.edu.ar/handle/20.500.12049/13520

Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorPeñacorada, Lucas-
dc.contributor.authorGómez, Ricardo-
dc.contributor.authorTunik, Maisa-
dc.contributor.authorCasadio, Silvio Alberto-
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-29T14:18:12Z-
dc.date.available2025-09-29T14:18:12Z-
dc.date.issued2025-04-
dc.identifier.citationPeñacorada, L., Gómez, R., Tunik, M., y Casadio, S. 2025. Transport and depositional processes of neogene pumiceous fragments in a distal fluvial system of the northern patagonian foreland (Argentina). Basin Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/bre.70028es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1365-2117es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://rid.unrn.edu.ar/handle/20.500.12049/13520-
dc.description.abstractThere are numerous studies analysing volcaniclastic supply to continental environments in distal areas from source volcanoes. However, there are few examples where large pumice fragments are mentioned in distal fluvial deposits. In this work, the Miocene synorogenic deposits of the Northern Patagonian Foreland (Chichinales and El Palo Formations) were studied. The deposits of the latter unit include pumice fragments with diameters of up to 30 cm that were accumulated in a fluvial environment more than 200 km from the Andean volcanic arc. Although previous works mention the presence of pumice in this unit, an analysis of the origin, the transport and depositional processes of these fragments was not carried out. Based on the study of stratigraphic sections along the extra-Andean zone, it was determined that the sediments of the Lower Miocene (Chichinales Formation) were deposited in a low-to-medium energy fluvial environment with development of wide floodplains and palaeosol formation during stability periods. The Middle Miocene?—Lower Pliocene deposits (El Palo Formation) correspond to a moderate-to-high energy braided fluvial system with occasional high discharge periods. The pumice fragments present in this unit were derived from the reworking of primary pyroclastic deposits outcropping at the foot of the Andes, associated with important explosive volcanic activity during the Miocene. These fragments were transported and deposited by both dilute flows and sediment gravity flows with high concentrations of pumice. Petrographic analysis of El Palo Formation sandstones showed a provenance mostly related to the erosion of pyroclastic, arc-related deposits. The main source areas would have been the Andean arc and the North Patagonian Massif. A maximum depositional age of 14.6 ± 1 Ma was obtained in a sample from the El Palo Formation, which constitutes the first U–Pb dating of detrital zircons from this unit in the study area. This age matches with a peak of magmatic activity of the Patagonian Batholith responsible for huge arc-derived ignimbrites recorded at the foot of the Andes.es_ES
dc.format.extentp. e70028es_ES
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.publisherWileyes_ES
dc.relation.urihttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bre.70028?af=Res_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/-
dc.titleTransport and Depositional Processes of Neogene Pumice Fragments in a Distal Fluvial System of the Northern Patagonian Foreland (Argentina)es_ES
dc.typeArticuloes_ES
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)-
dc.description.filiationFil: Peñacorada, Lucas. Instituto de Investigación en Paleobiología y Geología, Universidad Nacional de Río Negro. Argentina.es_ES
dc.description.filiationFil: Gómez, Ricardo. Géosciences Rennes, UMR 6118, CNRS Université de Rennes. Francia.es_ES
dc.description.filiationFil: Tunik, Maisa. Instituto de Investigación en Paleobiología y Geología, Universidad Nacional de Río Negro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET). Argentina.es_ES
dc.description.filiationFil: Casadio, Silvio. Facultad de Ingeniería, Geología, Universidad Andres Bello. Chile.es_ES
dc.subject.keyworddepositional processeses_ES
dc.subject.keywordMiocenees_ES
dc.subject.keywordnorthern Patagoniaes_ES
dc.subject.keywordpumice fragmentses_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dc.subject.materiaCiencias Exactas y Naturaleses_ES
dc.origin.lugarDesarrolloUniversidad Nacional de Río Negro, Instituto de Investigación en Paleobiología y Geologíaes_ES
dc.relation.journalissue37 (3)es_ES
dc.description.reviewtruees_ES
dc.description.resumenThere are numerous studies analysing volcaniclastic supply to continental environments in distal areas from source volcanoes. However, there are few examples where large pumice fragments are mentioned in distal fluvial deposits. In this work, the Miocene synorogenic deposits of the Northern Patagonian Foreland (Chichinales and El Palo Formations) were studied. The deposits of the latter unit include pumice fragments with diameters of up to 30 cm that were accumulated in a fluvial environment more than 200 km from the Andean volcanic arc. Although previous works mention the presence of pumice in this unit, an analysis of the origin, the transport and depositional processes of these fragments was not carried out. Based on the study of stratigraphic sections along the extra-Andean zone, it was determined that the sediments of the Lower Miocene (Chichinales Formation) were deposited in a low-to-medium energy fluvial environment with development of wide floodplains and palaeosol formation during stability periods. The Middle Miocene?—Lower Pliocene deposits (El Palo Formation) correspond to a moderate-to-high energy braided fluvial system with occasional high discharge periods. The pumice fragments present in this unit were derived from the reworking of primary pyroclastic deposits outcropping at the foot of the Andes, associated with important explosive volcanic activity during the Miocene. These fragments were transported and deposited by both dilute flows and sediment gravity flows with high concentrations of pumice. Petrographic analysis of El Palo Formation sandstones showed a provenance mostly related to the erosion of pyroclastic, arc-related deposits. The main source areas would have been the Andean arc and the North Patagonian Massif. A maximum depositional age of 14.6 ± 1 Ma was obtained in a sample from the El Palo Formation, which constitutes the first U–Pb dating of detrital zircons from this unit in the study area. This age matches with a peak of magmatic activity of the Patagonian Batholith responsible for huge arc-derived ignimbrites recorded at the foot of the Andes.es_ES
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/bre.70028-
dc.relation.journalTitleBasin Researches_ES
Aparece en las colecciones: Artículos

Archivos en este ítem:
Archivo Descripción Tamaño Formato  
6. Peñacorada et al 2025 BR.pdf16,37 MBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir

Este documento es resultado del financiamiento otorgado por el Estado Nacional, por lo tanto queda sujeto al cumplimiento de la Ley N° 26.899


Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons