Skip navigation
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://rid.unrn.edu.ar/handle/20.500.12049/11509

Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorSáez, Agustín-
dc.contributor.authorGaribaldi, Lucas Alejandro-
dc.contributor.authorAizen, Marcelo A.-
dc.contributor.authorMorales, Carolina L.-
dc.contributor.authorTraveset, Anna-
dc.contributor.authorde Groot, Grecia S.-
dc.contributor.authorSchmucki, Reto-
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-11T15:31:27Z-
dc.date.available2024-04-11T15:31:27Z-
dc.date.issued2023-10-20-
dc.identifier.citationSáez, A., Garibaldi, L. A., Aizen, M. A., Morales, C. L., Traveset, A., de Groot, G. S., & Schmucki, R. (2023). Phenological overlap between crop and pollinators: Contrasting influence of native and non‐native bees on raspberry fruits over the flowering season. Journal of Applied Ecology, 60(12), 2540-2549.es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1365-2664es_ES
dc.identifier.otherhttps://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1365-2664.14519-
dc.identifier.urihttp://rid.unrn.edu.ar/handle/20.500.12049/11509-
dc.description.abstractPhenological overlap between crop flowering and pollinators is a crucial trait for the pollination of more than 75% of the world's crops. However, crop management rarely considers the seasonal aspect of plant–pollinator mutualism. Here, we investigate the phenological overlap between crops and pollinators and how it affects pollination and fruit production. We measured the abundance and richness of native and non-native pollinators visiting raspberry flowers at two different times during the flowering season (i.e. early and late flowering periods) and examined their effects on crop yield in 16 fields. The community of pollinators foraging on raspberry flowers was more diverse and dominated by native pollinators during the early flowering period when most native plant species were flowering. Later in the season, when native flower resources declined in the surrounding environment, raspberry flowers were visited mainly by two non-native bees: managed honeybees and the invasive bumblebee Bombus terrestris. Pollinator contribution to raspberry yield was twice as high in the early flowering period compared to the late period (61% vs. 31% increase in drupelet set respectively). Flower damage caused by extremely high visitation frequencies by non-native bees in the late period was six times higher than in the early flowering period (30% vs. 5% of damaged flowers respectively). Synthesis and applications. Providing sufficient pollen and nectar resources to support wild pollinators over extended periods in agricultural landscapes can contribute to crop pollination and ensure high fruit weight and quality. This can be achieved by restoring natural and semi-natural areas near crop fields with native, long-flowering plant species. Growers and crop breeding programmes should consider selecting flowering times that coincide with periods of high diversity or abundance of native pollinators to reduce dependence on managed pollinators.es_ES
dc.format.extentp. 2540–2549es_ES
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.publisherWileyes_ES
dc.relation.urihttps://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/13652664#es_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/-
dc.titlePhenological overlap between crop and pollinators: Contrasting influence of native and non-native bees on raspberry fruits over the flowering seasones_ES
dc.typeArticuloes_ES
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)-
dc.description.filiationFil: Sáez, Agustín. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Rio Negro, Argentina.es_ES
dc.description.filiationFil: Garibaldi, Lucas Alejandro. Universidad Nacional de Río Negro. Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural. Río Negro, Argentina.es_ES
dc.description.filiationFil: Garibaldi, Lucas Alejandro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural. Río Negro, Argentina.es_ES
dc.description.filiationFil: Aizen, Marcelo A. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Rio Negro, Argentina.es_ES
dc.description.filiationFil: Morales, Carolina L. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Rio Negro, Argentina.es_ES
dc.description.filiationFil: Traveset, Anna. Mediterranean Institute for Advanced Studies. España.es_ES
dc.description.filiationFil: de Groot, Grecia S. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Rio Negro, Argentina.es_ES
dc.description.filiationFil: Schmucki, Reto. UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology. Reino Unido.es_ES
dc.subject.keywordcrop floweringes_ES
dc.subject.keywordcrop pollinationes_ES
dc.subject.keywordecosystem serviceses_ES
dc.subject.keywordflower resourceses_ES
dc.subject.keywordmanaged pollinatorses_ES
dc.subject.keywordnative pollinatorses_ES
dc.subject.keywordpollinator activityes_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dc.subject.materiaBiodiversidad y Conservaciónes_ES
dc.subject.materiaEcologíaes_ES
dc.subject.materiaAgricultura (General)es_ES
dc.origin.lugarDesarrolloUniversidad Nacional del Comahuees_ES
dc.relation.journalissue60 (12)es_ES
dc.description.reviewtruees_ES
dc.description.resumen-es_ES
dc.relation.journalTitleJournal of Applied Ecologyes_ES
Aparece en las colecciones: Artículos


Este documento es resultado del financiamiento otorgado por el Estado Nacional, por lo tanto queda sujeto al cumplimiento de la Ley N° 26.899


Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons