Skip navigation
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:

Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorBriones, Claudia Noemí-
dc.identifier.citationBriones, Claudia N. (2017). Spirituality we do not have such a Thing: Patrimonialization Processes as Minefields. MedCrave Group; Journal of Historical Archaeological & Anthropological Sciencies; 2; pp. 1-8es_ES
dc.format.extentp. 1-8es_ES
dc.titleSpirituality we do not have such a Thing: Patrimonialization Processes as Minefields.es_ES
dc.description.filiationFil: Briones, Claudia N. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte; Argentinaes_ES
dc.description.filiationFil: Briones, Claudia N. Instituto de Investigaciones en Diversidad Cultural y Procesos de Cambio; Argentinaes_ES
dc.description.filiationFil: Briones, Claudia N. Universidad Nacional de Río Negro; Argentinaes_ES
dc.subject.keywordPatrimonialization Processeses_ES
dc.subject.keywordIntercultural Arrangementses_ES
dc.subject.keywordMapuche Peoplees_ES
dc.subject.keywordEthnographic Museumes_ES
dc.subject.materiaCiencias Socialeses_ES
dc.origin.lugarDesarrolloMedCrave Groupes_ES
dc.description.resumenThree vignettes are used as points of departure to identify the dynamics of the politics of recognition of indigenous patrimony, in terms of the languages of contention enabled to struggle for rights of the meta cultural disputes becoming apparent in and through that struggle and of the tensions resulting from the hegemonic attempt to equalize different economies of value and affection and regimes of historicity. Once the main paradoxes of patrimonialization processes are presented, their unintended consequences and perilous effects are analyzed in three steps. First, a critical reading of the contemporary governmentality is advanced as far as the definition of patrimony is concerned. Second, Mapuche participation in the commemoration of the fortieth anniversary of the last military coup in Bariloche is analyzed, as to identify predicaments resulting from the clash of patrimonializations that focus upon the same event, from perspectives that make different critical comments on history, the places of memory and the environment. Once the instabilities of meanings that the event made apparent are identified, alternatives are explored to walk through these “minefields”, inherited from previous wars and current skirmishes.es_ES
dc.relation.journalTitleJournal of Historical Archaeological & Anthropological Sciencieses_ES
Aparece en las colecciones: Artículos

Archivos en este ítem:
Archivo Descripción Tamaño Formato,58 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir

Este documento es resultado del financiamiento otorgado por el Estado Nacional, por lo tanto queda sujeto al cumplimiento de la Ley N° 26.899