Skip navigation
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://rid.unrn.edu.ar/handle/20.500.12049/4094

Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorLevin, Luciano Guillermo-
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-29T13:23:00Z-
dc.date.available2020-01-29T13:23:00Z-
dc.date.issued2018-03-
dc.identifier.citationLevin, Luciano G. (2018). Addictions as a social construction: knowledge’s, public positioning, and state implementation of treatments. MOJ; Addiction Medicine & Therapy; 5 (3); 106-120.es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2573-2935es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://medcraveonline.com/MOJAMT/addictions-as-a-social-construction-knowledgersquos-public-positioning-and-state-implementation-of-treatments.html-
dc.identifier.urihttps://rid.unrn.edu.ar/jspui/handle/20.500.12049/4094-
dc.description.abstractThis paper describes and analyzes various ways in which drug addiction has been constructed from different cognitive perspectives, each of which has been conceptualized in terms of: a.The knowledge invoked for its theoretical demarcation and the knowledge produced as a result of that approach. b.The framing of drug addiction in the theoretical body and the representations that govern the so-called ?deviant behaviors? c.The particularization in the subset of problems known as ?medicalized behaviors? d.The historicization of the agents through which these problems materialize in actions and concrete institutions at the Argentine local state level. In this work we assume that the emergence of a problem of these characteristics, contingent decisions about how addiction is treated, what types of medical treatments should be implemented, where and by whom, are decisions that result from the interaction between different social actors that mobilize institutional mechanisms and knowledge that shape the interests of the parties involved and public opinion. Then we systematized each of the elements that have been identified in the respective conceptualizations, to show how the analysis of these dimensions allows us to explain the current structuring of the problem - social, public and knowledge.es_ES
dc.format.extentp. 106-120es_ES
dc.format.mediumdigitales_ES
dc.language.isoen_USes_ES
dc.publisherMOJes_ES
dc.titleAddictions as a social construction: knowledge´s, public positioning, and state implementation of treatmentses_ES
dc.typeArticuloes_ES
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/es_ES
dc.description.filiationFil: Levin, Luciano G. Universidad Nacional de Río Negro. Centro de Estudios en Ciencia, Tecnología y Desarrollo. Río Negro; Argentina.es_ES
dc.description.filiationFil: Levin, Luciano G. Universidad Nacional de La Pampa; Argentina.es_ES
dc.subject.keywordAddictiones_ES
dc.subject.keywordMedicalized Behaviores_ES
dc.subject.keywordDeviant Behaviorses_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersiones_ES
dc.subject.materiaAbuso de Sustanciases_ES
dc.origin.lugarDesarrolloCCTS-UMes_ES
dc.relation.journalissue5 (3)es_ES
dc.description.reviewtruees_ES
dc.description.resumenThis paper describes and analyzes various ways in which drug addiction has been constructed from different cognitive perspectives, each of which has been conceptualized in terms of: a.The knowledge invoked for its theoretical demarcation and the knowledge produced as a result of that approach. b.The framing of drug addiction in the theoretical body and the representations that govern the so-called ?deviant behaviors? c.The particularization in the subset of problems known as ?medicalized behaviors? d.The historicization of the agents through which these problems materialize in actions and concrete institutions at the Argentine local state level. In this work we assume that the emergence of a problem of these characteristics, contingent decisions about how addiction is treated, what types of medical treatments should be implemented, where and by whom, are decisions that result from the interaction between different social actors that mobilize institutional mechanisms and knowledge that shape the interests of the parties involved and public opinion. Then we systematized each of the elements that have been identified in the respective conceptualizations, to show how the analysis of these dimensions allows us to explain the current structuring of the problem - social, public and knowledge.es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.15406/mojamt.2018.05.00103-
dc.relation.journalTitleAddiction Medicine & Therapyes_ES
Aparece en las colecciones: Artículos

Archivos en este ítem:
Archivo Descripción Tamaño Formato  
MOJAMT-05-00103.pdf739,52 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir

Este documento es resultado del financiamiento otorgado por el Estado Nacional, por lo tanto queda sujeto al cumplimiento de la Ley N° 26.899